When an attacker penetrates the vagina he enters the Rape-aXe device. Upon his first withdrawal, the barbs attach themselves onto the skin of the penis and the rapist pulls the RX device out of the vagina.
The rapist is almost fully incapacitated by the pain caused by the embedded barbs. This has been described “as if the penis had been caught in a zipper” and the relaxing penis will drive the barbs deeper into the attacker’s flesh.
The victim can use the surprise effect and the time to escape/fight back. Thereby taking back the power which has been taken away.
The device cannot be removed by the attacker, but can only be removed by a clinician; this results in the positive identification of the attacker and can aid in his subsequent arrest and conviction. The removed device can be used to match the DNA of the attacker and victim in court.
Attempting to pull off the device will drive the hooks further into the attacker. If the rapist seeks medical help immediately, no harm is done to his penis. However, the victim has an opportunity in the moment to defend herself and take back her power.


Can this device be worn anally as protection from sodomites?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, the anatomy of the colon is very different from the vaginal canal. Rape-aXe will not function correctly, if placed in the anus.
LikeLiked by 1 person
l consider this to be an excellent safety device for females, the problem l have is as you are aware, many rapes of women occur during the consumption of alcohol, knowing this, a female may have given permission to make love with a selected partner but due to being ” pissed ” has forgotten about this safety device
LikeLike
A person cannot give consent if they are impaired by drugs or alcohol. Therefore, the scenario you describe is invalid in a court of law. If she is so “pissed” that she has lost her memory, then she is in no position to give consent; therefore it is rape. That being said, I have spoken to many women on this subject and they assure me that the scenario you present is not realistic. They cited a comparision of “I would/ have never forgotten to remove my tampon before intercourse… rape-aXe is not any different in that regard”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
l do accept your response, but l felt the question had to be asked, l do understand that a female would remove her tampon before ” lovemaking ” and wouldn’t forget not too, and that this device would be identical to this process.
It seems you have conducted some excellent due diligence safeguarding both men and women. If l had the funding l would wish to be a major investor, l encourage any ” well off ” individuals to invest in your product.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dear Edward, Thanks for your reply. I am pleased that I answered your question “convincingly”. Regarding investment, I certainly welcome ANY “investment” large or small from anywhere. This is truly a case of “beggars can’t be choosers” ; but if given a choice, I would prefer to see a 10 USD donation from 10,000 supporters than a 100,000 donation from 1 supporter. I truly believe in the power a grassroots movement and the incredible things we can accomplish if we all contribute “a little bit”. Please continue to spread the message! – Vince
LikeLiked by 1 person
If she is that drunk, then by law she can’t consent. Maybe don’t prey on drunk chicks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
drunks can’t consent
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope that comment is not directed at me personally, lm sure it’s not, however there are many unscrupulous males out there that would prey on drunk chick’s. They would be in for a very painful shock
LikeLiked by 1 person